<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Suzuki vs. Walmart CEO: The 2010 Walmart Canada Green Business Summit Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/</link>
	<description>What's really under all that Sustainability Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:28:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Eyler-Werve - Eyler-Werve</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Eyler-Werve - Eyler-Werve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] Greenbrief’s excellent account of WMT Canada’s 2010 Green Business Summit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greenbrief’s excellent account of WMT Canada’s 2010 Green Business Summit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Yes, it was a bit strange to be singled out as co-conspirators. There was no handy place to park a bike there&#039; either. Oh well. Keep on ridin&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it was a bit strange to be singled out as co-conspirators. There was no handy place to park a bike there&#8217; either. Oh well. Keep on ridin&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-478</guid>
		<description>The part that stuck in my minds was when the Premier made all the cyclists stand up and basically said we were awesome because we limit the stresses on the health care system.  

That&#039;s right Mr. Premier, I cycle to work, so that you can have lower premiums.  it all comes down to economics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part that stuck in my minds was when the Premier made all the cyclists stand up and basically said we were awesome because we limit the stresses on the health care system.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s right Mr. Premier, I cycle to work, so that you can have lower premiums.  it all comes down to economics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update, Adrian. I hope we can turn our ship around in a similar fashion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, Adrian. I hope we can turn our ship around in a similar fashion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Mohareb</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Mohareb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.  Interesting to see what&#039;s happening there; I&#039;m glad I&#039;ve discovered your site!

Regarding Dr. Suzuki&#039;s comments on Sweden, I spent last year there, and so have a good idea about what they&#039;ve done. The new numbers - their carbon tax is now $150/tonne, their emissions are down 12% from 1990 (in 2008), and economic growth was about 44-45% in real terms (total, not annual) between 1990 and 2008 - which would be closer to 2%/year in real terms, inflation taken out (might be 4% with inflation in). It&#039;ll be interesting to see what effect the recession, which dropped Sweden&#039;s GDP by 5% in 2009, will have on GHG emissions there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.  Interesting to see what&#8217;s happening there; I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;ve discovered your site!</p>
<p>Regarding Dr. Suzuki&#8217;s comments on Sweden, I spent last year there, and so have a good idea about what they&#8217;ve done. The new numbers &#8211; their carbon tax is now $150/tonne, their emissions are down 12% from 1990 (in 2008), and economic growth was about 44-45% in real terms (total, not annual) between 1990 and 2008 &#8211; which would be closer to 2%/year in real terms, inflation taken out (might be 4% with inflation in). It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what effect the recession, which dropped Sweden&#8217;s GDP by 5% in 2009, will have on GHG emissions there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Boyd</title>
		<link>http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/2010/02/david-suzuki-vs-walmart-ceo-the-2010-walmart-canada-green-business-summit-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unicyclecreative.com/wordpress/?p=578#comment-459</guid>
		<description>David Suzuki did not mince words. Finally, the word is getting out that billions of taxpayers dollars fund environmentally unsound programs that does little to help our planet. The &quot;triple bottom line&quot; created single stream collection of 4 or 5 items at the curb. It is about convenience, not the environment! Mr. Suzuki, thank you for pointing out the obvious. Calling curbside collection of commingled recyclable &quot;recycling&quot; is a green washing master piece. Burning garbage, which became incineration, which became waste to energy which will soon become renewable energy is a re-branding master piece. But it&#039;s still burning garbage! The solution is quite simple. We, as Canadians, have to stop electing &quot;talking heads&quot; that spew out what we want to hear at election time. Only to discover we get the opposite once they are elected. The environment is one of those things that is a great vote getter. Our reality though is we have community recycling programs that do little to help our planet but sure cost a lot of our tax dollars to fund. Geez, what would happen if communities across Canada had to have community environmental programs, that actually have an environmental benefit? What we get, is a fiscally responsible program that is the illusion of something sustainable. Government must stop selling the illusion of Zero Waste and sustainable recycling and start creating actual Requests For Proposals that help get us there. Our tax dollars fund programs that have little environmental benefit. Why not raise the bar? Here is a novel concept. Instead of using mostly waste consultants to prepare contracts in our communities for recycling, why not use Zero Waste consultants and sustainability experts? Wouldn&#039;t this be a great place to start? 

I think the business community recognizes that there needs to be change. Yes, it does seem a little odd that David is at this summit in front of as Walmart banner. But, if he doesn&#039;t talk to Walmart and other CAO and CEO&#039;s, then we can never get onto the same page. Walmart may be onto something here and we applaud them for this effort. Maybe next meeting, the big  business leaders should mingle at the same summit as small innovative business people. If we saw the WM CEO on the back of one of his garbage trucks on TV, we saw that he was touched as to what goes on in the trenches. The next Green Summit should involve all those who have innovative ideas to share? Ours is a franchise style Resource Recovery Park next to the shopping areas of every community. If citizens are able to get to a store to pick consumables up, why not drop off their organics and recyclable next door, at a convenient clean site? Not 4 items but dozens. 

It is time to think outside the box and as a small business, I urge those who move and shake things to not think this to death. This is simple. Recovering the resources buried in our discards is another useful tool to help reduce GHG emissions. Maximizing a persons vehicle trip when shopping by dropping of their recyclables  makes sense. We all need to carry some of the load. We have to do better, whether we like it or not. Convenient is not recycling. Cheap is not recycling. This ain&#039;t rocket science. Common sense needs to meet innovative business leaders. I have a Resource Recovery Park in Gibsons British Columbia but there are no contracts to bid on. It&#039;s all about cheap collection. For 6 years we have run on a shoe string budget. In our community of 5000 people, we started recycling Styrofoam. In a short period, we have diverted over 15x40&#039; trailer loads of loose EPS from our landfill. But, all contracts in our (and most) communities take only 4 or 5 items. 

Maybe it is time for less yaking and more action. Our forefathers knew the value of discards during the last depression. The 2 world wars were all about gathering and utilizing the natural resources embedded in discarded items. We need to look at Resource Recovery as the beginning point for getting to Zero Waste. With packaging changes, making more durable products, EPR programs and reusing materials such as glass again, the solution is not all that difficult. Just takes the will and raising the standard. We can&#039;t become more sustainable with a &quot;fast food style&quot; collection system. There must be programs that uses a system whereby there is less contamination of the recyclables, not more. Job creation from the clean recyclables in North America is not all that difficult. We need jobs at home. Exporting our recovered materials exports jobs. One day, there were no solar panels, no wind generators. When these 2 eco friendly products started being produced and considered as options to help our planet, it was awkward at first. Resource Recovery is at that stage on some levels. But, if viewed as a Reverse Shopping Center, the landscape could look a whole lot different in a few years, eh? 

What we are doing now is not working. So, a new approach is ended. The 3rd option to incineration and landfilling, has to be Zero Waste, Resource Recovery and common sense.

Buddy Boyd
Gibsons Recycling Depot
Gibsons BC
www.gibsonsrecycling.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Suzuki did not mince words. Finally, the word is getting out that billions of taxpayers dollars fund environmentally unsound programs that does little to help our planet. The &#8220;triple bottom line&#8221; created single stream collection of 4 or 5 items at the curb. It is about convenience, not the environment! Mr. Suzuki, thank you for pointing out the obvious. Calling curbside collection of commingled recyclable &#8220;recycling&#8221; is a green washing master piece. Burning garbage, which became incineration, which became waste to energy which will soon become renewable energy is a re-branding master piece. But it&#8217;s still burning garbage! The solution is quite simple. We, as Canadians, have to stop electing &#8220;talking heads&#8221; that spew out what we want to hear at election time. Only to discover we get the opposite once they are elected. The environment is one of those things that is a great vote getter. Our reality though is we have community recycling programs that do little to help our planet but sure cost a lot of our tax dollars to fund. Geez, what would happen if communities across Canada had to have community environmental programs, that actually have an environmental benefit? What we get, is a fiscally responsible program that is the illusion of something sustainable. Government must stop selling the illusion of Zero Waste and sustainable recycling and start creating actual Requests For Proposals that help get us there. Our tax dollars fund programs that have little environmental benefit. Why not raise the bar? Here is a novel concept. Instead of using mostly waste consultants to prepare contracts in our communities for recycling, why not use Zero Waste consultants and sustainability experts? Wouldn&#8217;t this be a great place to start? </p>
<p>I think the business community recognizes that there needs to be change. Yes, it does seem a little odd that David is at this summit in front of as Walmart banner. But, if he doesn&#8217;t talk to Walmart and other CAO and CEO&#8217;s, then we can never get onto the same page. Walmart may be onto something here and we applaud them for this effort. Maybe next meeting, the big  business leaders should mingle at the same summit as small innovative business people. If we saw the WM CEO on the back of one of his garbage trucks on TV, we saw that he was touched as to what goes on in the trenches. The next Green Summit should involve all those who have innovative ideas to share? Ours is a franchise style Resource Recovery Park next to the shopping areas of every community. If citizens are able to get to a store to pick consumables up, why not drop off their organics and recyclable next door, at a convenient clean site? Not 4 items but dozens. </p>
<p>It is time to think outside the box and as a small business, I urge those who move and shake things to not think this to death. This is simple. Recovering the resources buried in our discards is another useful tool to help reduce GHG emissions. Maximizing a persons vehicle trip when shopping by dropping of their recyclables  makes sense. We all need to carry some of the load. We have to do better, whether we like it or not. Convenient is not recycling. Cheap is not recycling. This ain&#8217;t rocket science. Common sense needs to meet innovative business leaders. I have a Resource Recovery Park in Gibsons British Columbia but there are no contracts to bid on. It&#8217;s all about cheap collection. For 6 years we have run on a shoe string budget. In our community of 5000 people, we started recycling Styrofoam. In a short period, we have diverted over 15&#215;40&#8242; trailer loads of loose EPS from our landfill. But, all contracts in our (and most) communities take only 4 or 5 items. </p>
<p>Maybe it is time for less yaking and more action. Our forefathers knew the value of discards during the last depression. The 2 world wars were all about gathering and utilizing the natural resources embedded in discarded items. We need to look at Resource Recovery as the beginning point for getting to Zero Waste. With packaging changes, making more durable products, EPR programs and reusing materials such as glass again, the solution is not all that difficult. Just takes the will and raising the standard. We can&#8217;t become more sustainable with a &#8220;fast food style&#8221; collection system. There must be programs that uses a system whereby there is less contamination of the recyclables, not more. Job creation from the clean recyclables in North America is not all that difficult. We need jobs at home. Exporting our recovered materials exports jobs. One day, there were no solar panels, no wind generators. When these 2 eco friendly products started being produced and considered as options to help our planet, it was awkward at first. Resource Recovery is at that stage on some levels. But, if viewed as a Reverse Shopping Center, the landscape could look a whole lot different in a few years, eh? </p>
<p>What we are doing now is not working. So, a new approach is ended. The 3rd option to incineration and landfilling, has to be Zero Waste, Resource Recovery and common sense.</p>
<p>Buddy Boyd<br />
Gibsons Recycling Depot<br />
Gibsons BC<br />
<a href="http://www.gibsonsrecycling.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.gibsonsrecycling.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

